nostr/nips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git synced 2024-11-09 22:09:06 -05:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

remove harmful remark from nip-10.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
fiatjaf 2023-08-17 08:17:24 -03:00
parent 88ee873c9e
commit 2f84cd97e3
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: BAD43C4BE5C1A3A1
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
10.md
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Where:
* `<event-id>` is the id of the event being referenced.
* `<relay-url>` is the URL of a recommended relay associated with the reference. Many clients treat this field as optional.
**The positions of the "e" tags within the event denote specific meanings as follows**:
* No "e" tag: <br>
@ -29,34 +29,34 @@ Where:
`["e", <id>]`: The id of the event to which this event is a reply.
* Two "e" tags: `["e", <root-id>]`, `["e", <reply-id>]` <br>
`<root-id>` is the id of the event at the root of the reply chain. `<reply-id>` is the id of the article to which this event is a reply.
`<root-id>` is the id of the event at the root of the reply chain. `<reply-id>` is the id of the article to which this event is a reply.
* Many "e" tags: `["e", <root-id>]` `["e", <mention-id>]`, ..., `["e", <reply-id>]`<br>
There may be any number of `<mention-ids>`. These are the ids of events which may, or may not be in the reply chain.
There may be any number of `<mention-ids>`. These are the ids of events which may, or may not be in the reply chain.
They are citings from this event. `root-id` and `reply-id` are as above.
>This scheme is deprecated because it creates ambiguities that are difficult, or impossible to resolve when an event references another but is not a reply.
## Marked "e" tags (PREFERRED)
`["e", <event-id>, <relay-url>, <marker>]`
`["e", <event-id>, <relay-url>, <marker>]`
Where:
* `<event-id>` is the id of the event being referenced.
* `<relay-url>` is the URL of a recommended relay associated with the reference. Clients SHOULD add a valid `<relay-URL>` field, but may instead leave it as `""`.
* `<marker>` is optional and if present is one of `"reply"`, `"root"`, or `"mention"`.
**The order of marked "e" tags is not relevant.** Those marked with `"reply"` denote the id of the reply event being responded to. Those marked with `"root"` denote the root id of the reply thread being responded to. For top level replies (those replying directly to the root event), only the `"root"` marker should be used. Those marked with `"mention"` denote a quoted or reposted event id.
Those marked with `"reply"` denote the id of the reply event being responded to. Those marked with `"root"` denote the root id of the reply thread being responded to. For top level replies (those replying directly to the root event), only the `"root"` marker should be used. Those marked with `"mention"` denote a quoted or reposted event id.
A direct reply to the root of a thread should have a single marked "e" tag of type "root".
>This scheme is preferred because it allows events to mention others without confusing them with `<reply-id>` or `<root-id>`.
>This scheme is preferred because it allows events to mention others without confusing them with `<reply-id>` or `<root-id>`.
## The "p" tag
Used in a text event contains a list of pubkeys used to record who is involved in a reply thread.
When replying to a text event E the reply event's "p" tags should contain all of E's "p" tags as well as the `"pubkey"` of the event being replied to.
When replying to a text event E the reply event's "p" tags should contain all of E's "p" tags as well as the `"pubkey"` of the event being replied to.
Example: Given a text event authored by `a1` with "p" tags [`p1`, `p2`, `p3`] then the "p" tags of the reply should be [`a1`, `p1`, `p2`, `p3`]
Example: Given a text event authored by `a1` with "p" tags [`p1`, `p2`, `p3`] then the "p" tags of the reply should be [`a1`, `p1`, `p2`, `p3`]
in no particular order.