From 45b1860b52025182d6400fd804a5d376a183ee40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: arthurfranca Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 19:37:10 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Mention other nostr identifiers --- 27.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/27.md b/27.md index 235b4a59..f4e4629d 100644 --- a/27.md +++ b/27.md @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ Once a mention is identified by a client, for example, when an user pastes a NIP The same process applies for referencing event IDs (using `nostr:nevent1...`), except that the client SHOULD NOT add the event id to the `.tags` with the tag `e` so to not negatively impact thread loading. Because `e` tags on `text notes` are usually considered ancestor events used to build a conversarion thread (as per NIP-10), it is advised to use inline references when mentioning events and NOT adding corresponding `e` tag to the `.tags` event key. +Other nostr identifiers should be referenced similarly using NIP-21 URLs inside event content (e.g. `nostr:naddr1...` for parameterized replaceable events). + Note that the usage of `nostr:npub1...` for profile mentions or `nostr:note1...` for event mentions is discouraged due to their lack of embedded relay recommendation. A reader client that receives a `text_note` event with such `nostr:...` mentions in its `.content` CAN do any desired context augmentation (for example, linking to the profile or showing a preview of the mentioned event contents) it wants in the process. If turning such mentions into links, they could become internal links, NIP-21 links or direct links to web clients that will handle these references.