mirror of
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git
synced 2024-12-22 08:25:53 -05:00
minor fixes and add NIP-01 integration claim
This commit is contained in:
parent
587ba71a7e
commit
8b26618c30
8
XXX.md
8
XXX.md
|
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ We want to eliminate this problem, and it is quite simple...
|
|||
|
||||
### Signature Prefixes
|
||||
|
||||
This NIP introduces a prefix mechanism for the `.sig` field of Nostr events, that by default (without any prefix) falls back to `Schnorr/secp256k1`, but when present defines the signature algorithm and public key derivation curve.
|
||||
This NIP introduces a prefix mechanism for the `.sig` field of Nostr events, that by default (without any prefix) falls back to `schnorr/secp256k1`, but when present defines the signature algorithm and public key derivation curve.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Signature Algorithms
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -106,4 +106,8 @@ To use another Signature Algorithm and another ECC Curve, an event would look li
|
|||
|
||||
### Clients and Relays
|
||||
|
||||
Clients and Relays are free to choose what combinations of Signatures Algorithms and ECC Curves they support, the only mandatory one is `Schnorr/secp256k1`, which is the default for Nostr, but highly encouraged to support more, at least `ecdsa` and `eddsa` with their default curves. This way Nostr network will be increasingly more compatible and possible to interoperate with other networks.
|
||||
Clients and Relays are free to choose what combinations of Signatures Algorithms and ECC Curves they support, the only mandatory one is `schnorr/secp256k1`, which is the default for Nostr, but highly encouraged to support more, at least `ecdsa` and `eddsa` with their default curves. This way Nostr network will be increasingly more compatible and possible to interoperate with other networks.
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration into NIP-01
|
||||
|
||||
We propose that this NIP, when discussed and approved, should be integrated into NIP-01, as it represents a global improvement for event signing. We decided to keep it separated in a different file to be more concise for discussion for now.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user