nostr/nips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git synced 2024-09-19 22:35:50 -04:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

clarify that nip-05 identifiers should not be treated as primary keys.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
fiatjaf 2022-12-29 10:54:37 -03:00
parent 81a87f7bf2
commit 997254ad7a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: BAD43C4BE5C1A3A1
1 changed files with 9 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
05.md
View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Mapping Nostr keys to DNS-based internet identifiers
`final` `optional` `author:fiatjaf` `final` `optional` `author:fiatjaf`
On events of type `0` (`set_metadata`) one can specify the key `"nip05"` with an [internet identifier](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322#section-3.4.1) (an email-like address) as the value. Although there is a link to a very liberal "internet identifier" specification above, NIP-05 assumes the `<local-part>` part will be restricted to the characters `a-z0-9-_.`, case insensitive. On events of kind `0` (`set_metadata`) one can specify the key `"nip05"` with an [internet identifier](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322#section-3.4.1) (an email-like address) as the value. Although there is a link to a very liberal "internet identifier" specification above, NIP-05 assumes the `<local-part>` part will be restricted to the characters `a-z0-9-_.`, case insensitive.
Upon seeing that, the client splits the identifier into `<local-part>` and `<domain>` and use these values to make a GET request to `https://<domain>/.well-known/nostr.json?name=<local-part>`. Upon seeing that, the client splits the identifier into `<local-part>` and `<domain>` and use these values to make a GET request to `https://<domain>/.well-known/nostr.json?name=<local-part>`.
@ -37,8 +37,16 @@ It will make a GET request to `https://example.com/.well-known/nostr.json?name=b
That will mean everything is alright. That will mean everything is alright.
## Finding users from their NIP-05 identifier
A client may implement support for finding users' public keys from _internet identifiers_, the flow is the same as above, but reversed: first the client fetches the _well-known_ URL and from there it gets the public key of the user, then it tries to fetch the kind `0` event for that user and check if it has a matching `"nip05"`.
## Notes ## Notes
### Clients must always follow public keys, not NIP-05 addresses
For example, if after finding that `bob@bob.com` has the public key `abc...def`, the user clicks a button to follow that profile, the client must keep a primary reference to `abc...def`, not `bob@bob.com`. If, for any reason, the address `https://bob.com/.well-known/nostr.json?name=bob` starts returning the public key `1d2...e3f` at any time in the future, the client must not replace `abc...def` in his list of followed profiles for the user (but it should stop displaying "bob@bob.com" for that user, as that will have become an invalid `"nip05"` property).
### User Discovery implementation suggestion ### User Discovery implementation suggestion
A client can also use this to allow users to search other profiles. If a client has a search box or something like that, a user may be able to type "bob@example.com" there and the client would recognize that and do the proper queries to obtain a pubkey and suggest that to the user. A client can also use this to allow users to search other profiles. If a client has a search box or something like that, a user may be able to type "bob@example.com" there and the client would recognize that and do the proper queries to obtain a pubkey and suggest that to the user.