nostr/nips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git synced 2024-11-09 22:09:06 -05:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'master' into patch-2

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Sepehr Safari 2024-08-20 08:55:56 +03:30 committed by GitHub
commit 9a4a375f26
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
10 changed files with 201 additions and 28 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

24
09.md
View File

@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
NIP-09
======
Event Deletion
Event Deletion Request
--------------
`draft` `optional`
A special event with kind `5`, meaning "deletion" is defined as having a list of one or more `e` or `a` tags, each referencing an event the author is requesting to be deleted. Deletion requests SHOULD include a `k` tag for the kind of each event being deleted.
A special event with kind `5`, meaning "deletion request" is defined as having a list of one or more `e` or `a` tags, each referencing an event the author is requesting to be deleted. Deletion requests SHOULD include a `k` tag for the kind of each event being requested for deletion.
The event's `content` field MAY contain a text note describing the reason for the deletion.
The event's `content` field MAY contain a text note describing the reason for the deletion request.
For example:
@ -28,24 +28,26 @@ For example:
}
```
Relays SHOULD delete or stop publishing any referenced events that have an identical `pubkey` as the deletion request. Clients SHOULD hide or otherwise indicate a deletion status for referenced events.
Relays SHOULD delete or stop publishing any referenced events that have an identical `pubkey` as the deletion request. Clients SHOULD hide or otherwise indicate a deletion request status for referenced events.
Relays SHOULD continue to publish/share the deletion events indefinitely, as clients may already have the event that's intended to be deleted. Additionally, clients SHOULD broadcast deletion events to other relays which don't have it.
Relays SHOULD continue to publish/share the deletion request events indefinitely, as clients may already have the event that's intended to be deleted. Additionally, clients SHOULD broadcast deletion request events to other relays which don't have it.
When an `a` tag is used, relays SHOULD delete all versions of the replaceable event up to the `created_at` timestamp of the deletion event.
When an `a` tag is used, relays SHOULD delete all versions of the replaceable event up to the `created_at` timestamp of the deletion request event.
## Client Usage
Clients MAY choose to fully hide any events that are referenced by valid deletion events. This includes text notes, direct messages, or other yet-to-be defined event kinds. Alternatively, they MAY show the event along with an icon or other indication that the author has "disowned" the event. The `content` field MAY also be used to replace the deleted events' own content, although a user interface should clearly indicate that this is a deletion reason, not the original content.
Clients MAY choose to fully hide any events that are referenced by valid deletion request events. This includes text notes, direct messages, or other yet-to-be defined event kinds. Alternatively, they MAY show the event along with an icon or other indication that the author has "disowned" the event. The `content` field MAY also be used to replace the deleted events' own content, although a user interface should clearly indicate that this is a deletion request reason, not the original content.
A client MUST validate that each event `pubkey` referenced in the `e` tag of the deletion request is identical to the deletion request `pubkey`, before hiding or deleting any event. Relays can not, in general, perform this validation and should not be treated as authoritative.
Clients display the deletion event itself in any way they choose, e.g., not at all, or with a prominent notice.
Clients display the deletion request event itself in any way they choose, e.g., not at all, or with a prominent notice.
Clients MAY choose to inform the user that their request for deletion does not guarantee deletion because it is impossible to delete events from all relays and clients.
## Relay Usage
Relays MAY validate that a deletion event only references events that have the same `pubkey` as the deletion itself, however this is not required since relays may not have knowledge of all referenced events.
Relays MAY validate that a deletion request event only references events that have the same `pubkey` as the deletion request itself, however this is not required since relays may not have knowledge of all referenced events.
## Deleting a Deletion
## Deletion Request of a Deletion Request
Publishing a deletion event against a deletion has no effect. Clients and relays are not obliged to support "undelete" functionality.
Publishing a deletion request event against a deletion request has no effect. Clients and relays are not obliged to support "unrequest deletion" functionality.

19
29.md
View File

@ -93,6 +93,20 @@ Any user can send one of these events to the relay in order to be automatically
}
```
- *leave request* (`kind:9022`)
Any user can send one of these events to the relay in order to be automatically removed from the group. The relay will automatically issue a `kind:9001` in response removing this user.
```js
{
"kind": 9022,
"content": "optional reason",
"tags": [
["h", "<group-id>"]
]
}
```
- *moderation events* (`kinds:9000-9020`) (optional)
Clients can send these events to a relay in order to accomplish a moderation action. Relays must check if the pubkey sending the event is capable of performing the given action. The relay may discard the event after taking action or keep it as a moderation log.
@ -120,8 +134,8 @@ Each moderation action uses a different kind and requires different arguments, w
| 9005 | `delete-event` | `e` (id hex) |
| 9006 | `edit-group-status` | `public` or `private`, `open` or `closed` |
| 9007 | `create-group` | |
| 9008 | `update-pin-list` | `e` (id hex) |
| 9008 | `delete-group` | |
| 9009 | `update-pin-list` | `e` (id hex) |
- *group metadata* (`kind:39000`) (optional)
@ -162,6 +176,7 @@ The list of capabilities, as defined by this NIP, for now, is the following:
- `add-permission`
- `remove-permission`
- `edit-group-status`
- `delete-group`
- `update-pin-list`
```js

2
32.md
View File

@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ Author is labeling their note language as English using ISO-639-1.
Other Notes
-----------
When using this NIP to bulk-label many targets at once, events may be deleted and a replacement
When using this NIP to bulk-label many targets at once, events may be requested for deletion using [NIP-09](09.md) and a replacement
may be published. We have opted not to use parameterizable/replaceable events for this due to the
complexity in coming up with a standard `d` tag. In order to avoid ambiguity when querying,
publishers SHOULD limit labeling events to a single namespace.

2
34.md
View File

@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ An optional source of truth for the state of branches and tags in a repository.
The `refs` tag may appear multiple times, or none.
If no `refs` tags are present, the author is no longer tracking repository state using this event. This approach enables the author to restart tracking state at a later time unlike [NIP-09](09.md) deletion.
If no `refs` tags are present, the author is no longer tracking repository state using this event. This approach enables the author to restart tracking state at a later time unlike [NIP-09](09.md) deletion requests.
The `refs` tag can be optionally extended to enable clients to identify how many commits ahead a ref is:

12
52.md
View File

@ -187,6 +187,10 @@ This NIP is intentionally not defining who is authorized to attend a calendar ev
This NIP is also intentionally not defining what happens if a calendar event changes after an RSVP is submitted.
The RSVP MUST have an `a` tag of the event coordinates to the calendar event, and optionally an `e` tag of the id of the specific calendar event revision. If an `e` tag is present, clients SHOULD interpret it as an indication that the RSVP is a response to that revision of the calendar event, and MAY interpret it to not necessarily apply to other revisions of the calendar event.
The RSVP MAY tag the author of the calendar event it is in response to using a `p` tag so that clients can easily query all RSVPs that pertain to the author.
### Format
The format uses a parameterized replaceable event kind `31925`.
@ -194,10 +198,12 @@ The format uses a parameterized replaceable event kind `31925`.
The `.content` of these events is optional and should be a free-form note that adds more context to this calendar event response.
The list of tags are as follows:
* `a` (required) reference tag to kind `31922` or `31923` calendar event being responded to.
* `a` (required) coordinates to a kind `31922` or `31923` calendar event being responded to.
* `e` (optional) event id of a kind `31922` or `31923` calendar event being responded to.
* `d` (required) universally unique identifier. Generated by the client creating the calendar event RSVP.
* `status` (required) `accepted`, `declined`, or `tentative`. Determines attendance status to the referenced calendar event.
* `fb` (optional) `free` or `busy`. Determines if the user would be free or busy for the duration of the calendar event. This tag must be omitted or ignored if the `status` label is set to `declined`.
* `p` (optional) pubkey of the author of the calendar event being responded to.
```json
{
@ -207,10 +213,12 @@ The list of tags are as follows:
"kind": 31925,
"content": "<note>",
"tags": [
["a", "<31922 or 31923>:<calendar event author pubkey>:<d-identifier of calendar event>", "<optional relay url>"],
["e", "<kind 31922 or 31923 event id", "<optional recommended relay URL>"]
["a", "<31922 or 31923>:<calendar event author pubkey>:<d-identifier of calendar event>", "<optional recommended relay URL>"],
["d", "<UUID>"],
["status", "<accepted/declined/tentative>"],
["fb", "<free/busy>"],
["p", "<hex pubkey of kind 31922 or 31923 event>", "<optional recommended relay URL>"]
]
}
```

10
54.md
View File

@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ Articles are identified by lowercase, normalized ascii `d` tags.
### Content rules
The content should be Markdown, following the same rules as of [NIP-23](23.md), although it takes some extra (optional) metadata tags:
The content should be Asciidoc, following the same rules as of [NIP-23](23.md), although it takes some extra (optional) metadata tags:
- `title`: for when the display title should be different from the `d` tag.
- `summary`: for display in lists.
- `a` and `e`: for referencing the original event a wiki article was forked from.
One extra functionality is added: **wikilinks**. Unlike normal Markdown links `[]()` that link to webpages, wikilinks `[[]]` link to other articles in the wiki. In this case, the wiki is the entirety of Nostr. Clicking on a wikilink should cause the client to ask relays for events with `d` tags equal to the target of that wikilink.
One extra functionality is added: **wikilinks**. Unlike normal Asciidoc links `[]()` that link to webpages, wikilinks `[[]]` link to other articles in the wiki. In this case, the wiki is the entirety of Nostr. Clicking on a wikilink should cause the client to ask relays for events with `d` tags equal to the target of that wikilink.
Wikilinks can take these two forms:
@ -86,12 +86,12 @@ This is a stronger signal of trust than a `+` reaction.
This marker is useful when a user edits someone else's entry; if the original author includes the editor's changes and the editor doesn't want to keep/maintain an independent version, the `link` tag could effectively be a considered a "deletion" of the editor's version and putting that pubkey's WoT weight behind the original author's version.
Why Markdown?
Why Asciidoc?
-------------
If the idea is to make a wiki then the most obvious text format to use is probably the mediawiki/wikitext format used by Wikipedia since it's widely deployed in all mediawiki installations and used for decades with great success. However, it turns out that format is very bloated and convoluted, has way too many features and probably because of that it doesn't have many alternative implementations out there, and the ones that exist are not complete and don't look very trustworthy. Also it is very much a centralized format that can probably be changed at the whims of the Wikipedia owners.
Wikitext is [garbage](nostr:nevent1qqsqt0gcggry60n72uglhuhypdlmr2dm6swjj69jex5v530gcpazlzsprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wdmksetjv5hxxmmdqy28wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hsygpm7rrrljungc6q0tuh5hj7ue863q73qlheu4vywtzwhx42a7j9n5ueneex) and Markdown is not powerful enough (besides being too freeform and unspecified and prone to generate incompatibilities in the future).
On the other hand, Markdown has proven to work well for small scale wikis and one of the biggest wikis in the planet (which is not very often thought of as a wiki), [StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com) and its child sites, and also one of the biggest "personal wiki" software, [Obsidian](https://obsidian.md/). Markdown can probably deliver 95% of the functionality of wikitext. When augmented with tables, diagram generators and MathJax (which are common extensions that exist in the wild and can be included in this NIP) that rate probably goes to 99%, and its simplicity is a huge benefit that can't be overlooked. Wikitext format can also be transpíled into Markdown using Pandoc. Given all that, I think it's a reasonable suspicion that mediawiki is not inherently better than Markdown, the success of Wikipedia probably cannot be predicated on the syntax language choice.
Asciidoc has a strict spec, multiple implementations in many languages, and support for features that are very much necessary in a wiki article, like _sidebars_, _tables_ (with rich markup inside cells), many levels of _headings_, _footnotes_, _superscript_ and _subscript_ markup and _description lists_. It is also arguably easier to read in its plaintext format than Markdown (and certainly much better than Wikitext).
# Appendix 1: Merge requests
Users can request other users to get their entries merged into someone else's entry by creating a `kind:818` event.

146
64.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
NIP-64
======
Chess (Portable Game Notation)
-----
`draft` `optional`
This NIP defines `kind:64` notes representing chess games in [PGN][pgn_specification] format, which can be read by humans and is also supported by most chess software.
## Note
### Content
The `.content` of these notes is a string representing a [PGN-database][pgn_formal_syntax].
### Notes
```json
{
"kind": 64,
"content": "1. e4 *",
...
}
```
```json
{
"kind": 64,
"tags": [
["alt", "Fischer vs. Spassky in Belgrade on 1992-11-04 (F/S Return Match, Round 29)"],
...
],
"content": "[Event \"F/S Return Match\"]\n[Site \"Belgrade, Serbia JUG\"]\n[Date \"1992.11.04\"]\n[Round \"29\"]\n[White \"Fischer, Robert J.\"]\n[Black \"Spassky, Boris V.\"]\n[Result \"1/2-1/2\"]\n\n1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 {This opening is called the Ruy Lopez.} 3... a6\n4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Nb8 10. d4 Nbd7\n11. c4 c6 12. cxb5 axb5 13. Nc3 Bb7 14. Bg5 b4 15. Nb1 h6 16. Bh4 c5 17. dxe5\nNxe4 18. Bxe7 Qxe7 19. exd6 Qf6 20. Nbd2 Nxd6 21. Nc4 Nxc4 22. Bxc4 Nb6\n23. Ne5 Rae8 24. Bxf7+ Rxf7 25. Nxf7 Rxe1+ 26. Qxe1 Kxf7 27. Qe3 Qg5 28. Qxg5\nhxg5 29. b3 Ke6 30. a3 Kd6 31. axb4 cxb4 32. Ra5 Nd5 33. f3 Bc8 34. Kf2 Bf5\n35. Ra7 g6 36. Ra6+ Kc5 37. Ke1 Nf4 38. g3 Nxh3 39. Kd2 Kb5 40. Rd6 Kc5 41. Ra6\nNf2 42. g4 Bd3 43. Re6 1/2-1/2"
...
}
```
## Client Behavior
Clients SHOULD display the content represented as chessboard.
Clients SHOULD publish PGN notes in ["export format"][pgn_export_format] ("strict mode", i.e. created by machines) but expect incoming notes to be in ["import format"][pgn_import_format] ("lax mode", i.e. created by humans).
Clients SHOULD check whether the formatting is valid and all moves comply with chess rules.
Clients MAY include additional tags (e.g. like [`"alt"`](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/31.md)) in order to represent the note to users of non-supporting clients.
## Relay Behavior
Relays MAY validate PGN contents and reject invalid notes.
## Examples
```pgn
// A game where nothing is known. Game still in progress, game abandoned, or result otherwise unknown.
// Maybe players died before a move has been made.
*
```
```pgn
1. e4 *
```
```pgn
[White "Fischer, Robert J."]
[Black "Spassky, Boris V."]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 {This opening is called the Ruy Lopez.} *
```
```pgn
[Event "F/S Return Match"]
[Site "Belgrade, Serbia JUG"]
[Date "1992.11.04"]
[Round "29"]
[White "Fischer, Robert J."]
[Black "Spassky, Boris V."]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 {This opening is called the Ruy Lopez.} 3... a6
4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Nb8 10. d4 Nbd7
11. c4 c6 12. cxb5 axb5 13. Nc3 Bb7 14. Bg5 b4 15. Nb1 h6 16. Bh4 c5 17. dxe5
Nxe4 18. Bxe7 Qxe7 19. exd6 Qf6 20. Nbd2 Nxd6 21. Nc4 Nxc4 22. Bxc4 Nb6
23. Ne5 Rae8 24. Bxf7+ Rxf7 25. Nxf7 Rxe1+ 26. Qxe1 Kxf7 27. Qe3 Qg5 28. Qxg5
hxg5 29. b3 Ke6 30. a3 Kd6 31. axb4 cxb4 32. Ra5 Nd5 33. f3 Bc8 34. Kf2 Bf5
35. Ra7 g6 36. Ra6+ Kc5 37. Ke1 Nf4 38. g3 Nxh3 39. Kd2 Kb5 40. Rd6 Kc5 41. Ra6
Nf2 42. g4 Bd3 43. Re6 1/2-1/2
```
```pgn
[Event "Hourly HyperBullet Arena"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/wxx4GldJ"]
[Date "2017.04.01"]
[White "T_LUKE"]
[Black "decidement"]
[Result "1-0"]
[UTCDate "2017.04.01"]
[UTCTime "11:56:14"]
[WhiteElo "2047"]
[BlackElo "1984"]
[WhiteRatingDiff "+10"]
[BlackRatingDiff "-7"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "30+0"]
[ECO "B00"]
[Termination "Abandoned"]
1. e4 1-0
[Event "Hourly HyperBullet Arena"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/rospUdSk"]
[Date "2017.04.01"]
[White "Bastel"]
[Black "oslochess"]
[Result "1-0"]
[UTCDate "2017.04.01"]
[UTCTime "11:55:56"]
[WhiteElo "2212"]
[BlackElo "2000"]
[WhiteRatingDiff "+6"]
[BlackRatingDiff "-4"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "30+0"]
[ECO "A01"]
[Termination "Normal"]
1. b3 d5 2. Bb2 c6 3. Nc3 Bf5 4. d4 Nf6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. f4 Bg6 7. Nf3 Bh5 8. Bd3 e6 9. O-O Be7 10. Qe1 O-O 11. Ne5 Bg6 12. Nxg6 hxg6 13. e4 dxe4 14. Nxe4 Nxe4 15. Bxe4 Nf6 16. c4 Bd6 17. Bc2 Qc7 18. f5 Be7 19. fxe6 fxe6 20. Qxe6+ Kh8 21. Qh3+ Kg8 22. Bxg6 Qd7 23. Qe3 Bd6 24. Bf5 Qe7 25. Be6+ Kh8 26. Qh3+ Nh7 27. Bf5 Rf6 28. Qxh7# 1-0
```
## Resources
- [PGN Specification][pgn_specification]: PGN (Portable Game Notation) specification
- [PGN Specification Supplement](https://github.com/mliebelt/pgn-spec-commented/blob/main/pgn-spec-supplement.md): Addition for adding graphical elements, clock values, eval, ...
- [PGN Formal Syntax][pgn_formal_syntax]
- [PGN Seven Tag Roster][pgn_seven_tag_roster]
- [PGN Import Format][pgn_import_format]
- [PGN Export Format][pgn_export_format]
- [lichess / pgn-viewer (GitHub)](https://github.com/lichess-org/pgn-viewer): PGN viewer widget, designed to be embedded in content pages
[pgn_specification]: https://github.com/mliebelt/pgn-spec-commented/blob/main/pgn-specification.md
[pgn_formal_syntax]: https://github.com/mliebelt/pgn-spec-commented/blob/main/pgn-specification.md#18-formal-syntax
[pgn_seven_tag_roster]: https://github.com/mliebelt/pgn-spec-commented/blob/main/pgn-specification.md#811-seven-tag-roster
[pgn_import_format]: https://github.com/mliebelt/pgn-spec-commented/blob/main/pgn-specification.md#31-import-format-allows-for-manually-prepared-data
[pgn_export_format]: https://github.com/mliebelt/pgn-spec-commented/blob/main/pgn-specification.md#32-export-format-used-for-program-generated-output

2
71.md
View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Video Events
`draft` `optional`
This specification defines video events representing a dedicated post of externally hosted content. These video events are _parameterized replaceable_ and deletable per [NIP-09](09.md).
This specification defines video events representing a dedicated post of externally hosted content. These video events are _parameterized replaceable_ and delete requestable per [NIP-09](09.md).
Unlike a `kind 1` event with a video attached, Video Events are meant to contain all additional metadata concerning the subject media and to be surfaced in video-specific clients rather than general micro-blogging clients. The thought is for events of this kind to be referenced in a Netflix, YouTube, or TikTok like nostr client where the video itself is at the center of the experience.

2
72.md
View File

@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ An approval event MUST include one or more community `a` tags, an `e` or `a` tag
The event SHOULD also include the JSON-stringified `post request` event inside the `.content`, and a `k` tag with the original post's event kind to allow filtering of approved posts by kind.
Moderators MAY delete their approval of a post at any time using NIP 09 event deletions.
Moderators MAY request deletion of their approval of a post at any time using [NIP-09 event deletion requests](09.md).
```jsonc
{

10
README.md
View File

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
- [NIP-06: Basic key derivation from mnemonic seed phrase](06.md)
- [NIP-07: `window.nostr` capability for web browsers](07.md)
- [NIP-08: Handling Mentions](08.md) --- **unrecommended**: deprecated in favor of [NIP-27](27.md)
- [NIP-09: Event Deletion](09.md)
- [NIP-09: Event Deletion Request](09.md)
- [NIP-10: Conventions for clients' use of `e` and `p` tags in text events](10.md)
- [NIP-11: Relay Information Document](11.md)
- [NIP-13: Proof of Work](13.md)
@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
- [NIP-57: Lightning Zaps](57.md)
- [NIP-58: Badges](58.md)
- [NIP-59: Gift Wrap](59.md)
- [NIP-64: Chess (PGN)](64.md)
- [NIP-65: Relay List Metadata](65.md)
- [NIP-70: Protected Events](70.md)
- [NIP-71: Video Events](71.md)
@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
| `2` | Recommend Relay | 01 (deprecated) |
| `3` | Follows | [02](02.md) |
| `4` | Encrypted Direct Messages | [04](04.md) |
| `5` | Event Deletion | [09](09.md) |
| `5` | Event Deletion Request | [09](09.md) |
| `6` | Repost | [18](18.md) |
| `7` | Reaction | [25](25.md) |
| `8` | Badge Award | [58](58.md) |
@ -115,6 +116,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
| `42` | Channel Message | [28](28.md) |
| `43` | Channel Hide Message | [28](28.md) |
| `44` | Channel Mute User | [28](28.md) |
| `64` | Chess (PGN) | [64](64.md) |
| `818` | Merge Requests | [54](54.md) |
| `1021` | Bid | [15](15.md) |
| `1022` | Bid confirmation | [15](15.md) |
@ -262,7 +264,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
| `encrypted` | -- | -- | [90](90.md) |
| `expiration` | unix timestamp (string) | -- | [40](40.md) |
| `goal` | event id (hex) | relay URL | [75](75.md) |
| `image` | image URL | dimensions in pixels | [23](23.md), [58](58.md) |
| `image` | image URL | dimensions in pixels | [23](23.md), [52](52.md), [58](58.md) |
| `imeta` | inline metadata | -- | [92](92.md) |
| `lnurl` | `bech32` encoded `lnurl` | -- | [57](57.md) |
| `location` | location string | -- | [52](52.md), [99](99.md) |
@ -276,7 +278,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
| `relays` | relay list | -- | [57](57.md) |
| `server` | file storage server url | -- | [96](96.md) |
| `subject` | subject | -- | [14](14.md), [17](17.md) |
| `summary` | article summary | -- | [23](23.md) |
| `summary` | summary | -- | [23](23.md), [52](52.md) |
| `thumb` | badge thumbnail | dimensions in pixels | [58](58.md) |
| `title` | article title | -- | [23](23.md) |
| `web` | webpage URL | -- | [34](34.md) |