From a0852a7cbeafdd9a00537dda8ece29fda9124de0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: khimaros Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:02:07 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] stronger wording for relay deletion behavior - change "MAY" to "SHOULD" for removing referenced events - suggest indefinite retention for deletion events on relays - include recommendation for clients to rebroadcast deletion events to relays --- 09.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/09.md b/09.md index 0a0d1495..881eb8a4 100644 --- a/09.md +++ b/09.md @@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ For example: } ``` -Relays MAY delete or stop publishing any referenced events that have an identical `pubkey` as the deletion request. Clients may hide or otherwise indicate a deletion status for referenced events. +Relays SHOULD delete or stop publishing any referenced events that have an identical `pubkey` as the deletion request. Clients SHOULD hide or otherwise indicate a deletion status for referenced events. + +Relays SHOULD continue to publish/share the deletion events indefinitely, as clients may already have the event that's intended to be deleted. Additionally, clients SHOULD broadcast deletion events to other relays which don't have it. ## Client Usage