mirror of
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git
synced 2024-12-25 09:45:51 -05:00
Moves the kind 1 definition to NIP-10
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1b9ffdd09
commit
c4daa69498
1
01.md
1
01.md
|
@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ In case of replaceable events with the same timestamp, the event with the lowest
|
|||
This NIP defines two kinds:
|
||||
|
||||
- `kind:0`: **User Metadata**: An event kind to add name and other information to the pubkey. The `content` is set to a stringified JSON object `{name: <user's name, string>, about: <string>, picture: <url, string>}`
|
||||
- `kind:1`: **Text Note**: An event kind to transfer **plaintext** content in it's `.content` property. Markup language such as markdown and HTML SHOULD not be used.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tags
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
68
10.md
68
10.md
|
@ -1,14 +1,48 @@
|
|||
NIP-10
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
On "e" and "p" tags in Text Events (kind 1).
|
||||
--------------------------------------------
|
||||
Text Notes
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
`draft` `optional`
|
||||
|
||||
## Abstract
|
||||
This NIP describes how to use "e" and "p" tags in text events, especially those that are replies to other text events. It helps clients thread the replies into a tree rooted at the original event.
|
||||
This NIP defines a `kind:1` as a simple plaintext note.
|
||||
|
||||
The `.content` property contains a text.
|
||||
|
||||
`e` and `p` tags can be used to define note threads, replies, mentions and quotes.
|
||||
|
||||
Markup language such as markdown and HTML SHOULD not be used.
|
||||
|
||||
## The `p` tag
|
||||
|
||||
`["p", <pubkey>, <relay-url>]`
|
||||
|
||||
Used in a text event contains a list of pubkeys used to record who is involved in a reply thread.
|
||||
|
||||
When replying to a text event E the reply event's `p` tags should contain all of E's `p` tags as well as the `"pubkey"` of the event being replied to.
|
||||
|
||||
Example: Given a text event authored by `a1` with `p` tags [`p1`, `p2`, `p3`] then the `p` tags of the reply should be [`a1`, `p1`, `p2`, `p3`]
|
||||
in no particular order.
|
||||
|
||||
## Marked `e` tags
|
||||
|
||||
The `e`-tag is defined as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
`["e", <event-id>, <relay-url>, <marker>]`
|
||||
|
||||
Where:
|
||||
|
||||
* `<event-id>` is the id of the event being referenced.
|
||||
* `<relay-url>` is the URL of a recommended relay associated with the reference. Clients SHOULD add a valid `<relay-URL>` field, but may instead leave it as `""`.
|
||||
* `<marker>` is optional and if present is one of `"reply"`, `"root"`, or `"mention"`.
|
||||
|
||||
Those marked with `"reply"` denote the id of the reply event being responded to. Those marked with `"root"` denote the root id of the reply thread being responded to. For top level replies (those replying directly to the root event), only the `"root"` marker should be used. Those marked with `"mention"` denote a quoted or reposted event id.
|
||||
|
||||
A direct reply to the root of a thread should have a single marked `e` tag of type "root".
|
||||
|
||||
> This scheme is preferred because it allows events to mention others without confusing them with `<reply-id>` or `<root-id>`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Positional "e" tags (DEPRECATED)
|
||||
>This scheme is in common use; but should be considered deprecated.
|
||||
|
@ -36,27 +70,3 @@ There may be any number of `<mention-ids>`. These are the ids of events which m
|
|||
They are citing from this event. `root-id` and `reply-id` are as above.
|
||||
|
||||
>This scheme is deprecated because it creates ambiguities that are difficult, or impossible to resolve when an event references another but is not a reply.
|
||||
|
||||
## Marked "e" tags (PREFERRED)
|
||||
`["e", <event-id>, <relay-url>, <marker>]`
|
||||
|
||||
Where:
|
||||
|
||||
* `<event-id>` is the id of the event being referenced.
|
||||
* `<relay-url>` is the URL of a recommended relay associated with the reference. Clients SHOULD add a valid `<relay-URL>` field, but may instead leave it as `""`.
|
||||
* `<marker>` is optional and if present is one of `"reply"`, `"root"`, or `"mention"`.
|
||||
|
||||
Those marked with `"reply"` denote the id of the reply event being responded to. Those marked with `"root"` denote the root id of the reply thread being responded to. For top level replies (those replying directly to the root event), only the `"root"` marker should be used. Those marked with `"mention"` denote a quoted or reposted event id.
|
||||
|
||||
A direct reply to the root of a thread should have a single marked "e" tag of type "root".
|
||||
|
||||
>This scheme is preferred because it allows events to mention others without confusing them with `<reply-id>` or `<root-id>`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## The "p" tag
|
||||
Used in a text event contains a list of pubkeys used to record who is involved in a reply thread.
|
||||
|
||||
When replying to a text event E the reply event's "p" tags should contain all of E's "p" tags as well as the `"pubkey"` of the event being replied to.
|
||||
|
||||
Example: Given a text event authored by `a1` with "p" tags [`p1`, `p2`, `p3`] then the "p" tags of the reply should be [`a1`, `p1`, `p2`, `p3`]
|
||||
in no particular order.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user