nostr/nips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git synced 2024-12-22 08:25:53 -05:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix nip-41 links to PR #1032 instead

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
ice-orestes 2024-09-09 16:23:07 +01:00
parent 9d9e98f463
commit faa1135102
No known key found for this signature in database
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
0b.md
View File

@ -12,18 +12,18 @@ This NIP defines a simple way for an Identity Sub-Key management system, includi
The state of art now has two methods for enabling sub-key management:
- [NIP-26](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/26.md): Multiple key delegation and no revocation (just time bound)
- [NIP-41](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/41.md): More complete single key delegation and revocation (complex)
- [NIP-41](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1032): More complete single key delegation and revocation (complex)
Each of these methods has their own pros and cons, but there's a very common use case that is not covered by any of these methods completely, which is having a master identity that is secure (possibly in cold storage), that can whitelist and blacklist multiple public keys (one for each device or app, for example), that can be used individually (less common but interesting for media management companies) and can publish on-behalf of one or several master identities.
Using [NIP-26](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/26.md) for this purpose doesn't allow for blacklisting (revocation), or alternatively requires time bound delegation, with new delegation signing at every expiry. On the other hand [NIP-41](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/41.md) is a more complete and complex identity management solution, but only allows for one active sub-key at any point in time, and that sub-key's only purpose is bound to the main identity.
Using [NIP-26](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/26.md) for this purpose doesn't allow for blacklisting (revocation), or alternatively requires time bound delegation, with new delegation signing at every expiry. On the other hand [NIP-41](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1032) is a more complete and complex identity management solution, but only allows for one active sub-key at any point in time, and that sub-key's only purpose is bound to the main identity.
### References
This proposal came together with inputs from many other proposals and discussions, but these are the main ones:
[NIP-26: Delegated Event Signing](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/26.md)<br>
[NIP-41: Identity Management](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/41.md)<br>
[NIP-41: Identity Management](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1032)<br>
[NIP-06: Basic Key Derivation from Mnemonic Seed Phrase](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/06.md)<br>
[NIP-51: Lists](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/51.md)
@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ This NIP introduces a replaceable event with `kind 10100`, which is used to keep
`.content` fields is unused and can be ignored if present.
This list is owned by the master account, and can only be updated by an event signed by the master account itself, so never using a `b` on-behalf tag (see below), neither by [NIP-41](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/41.md) `p` tag in `kind 0`, nor using a [NIP-26](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/26.md) `delegation` tag.
This list is owned by the master account, and can only be updated by an event signed by the master account itself, so never using a `b` on-behalf tag (see below), neither by [NIP-41](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1032) `p` tag in `kind 0`, nor using a [NIP-26](https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/26.md) `delegation` tag.
This list is ever growing, so each update has to include all previous attestations unchanged, and add one or more attestations to the list, otherwise they should be considered invalid and ignored by clients and relays.