nostr/nips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git synced 2024-12-22 00:25:50 -05:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update NIP-09 to rename to deletion request

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Terry Yiu 2024-08-15 01:19:07 -04:00
parent 95885afe2d
commit 0ee877275a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 108645AE8A19B71A
7 changed files with 20 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
09.md
View File

@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
NIP-09
======
Event Retraction
Event Deletion Request
--------------
`draft` `optional`
A special event with kind `5`, meaning "retraction" is defined as having a list of one or more `e` or `a` tags, each referencing an event the author is requesting to be retracted. Retraction requests SHOULD include a `k` tag for the kind of each event being retracted.
A special event with kind `5`, meaning "deletion request" is defined as having a list of one or more `e` or `a` tags, each referencing an event the author is requesting to be deleted. Deletion requests SHOULD include a `k` tag for the kind of each event being requested for deletion.
The event's `content` field MAY contain a text note describing the reason for the retraction.
The event's `content` field MAY contain a text note describing the reason for the deletion request.
For example:
@ -28,26 +28,26 @@ For example:
}
```
Relays SHOULD delete or stop publishing any referenced events that have an identical `pubkey` as the retraction request. Clients SHOULD hide or otherwise indicate a retraction status for referenced events.
Relays SHOULD delete or stop publishing any referenced events that have an identical `pubkey` as the deletion request. Clients SHOULD hide or otherwise indicate a deletion request status for referenced events.
Relays SHOULD continue to publish/share the retraction events indefinitely, as clients may already have the event that's intended to be retracted. Additionally, clients SHOULD broadcast retraction events to other relays which don't have it.
Relays SHOULD continue to publish/share the deletion request events indefinitely, as clients may already have the event that's intended to be deleted. Additionally, clients SHOULD broadcast deletion request events to other relays which don't have it.
When an `a` tag is used, relays SHOULD delete all versions of the replaceable event up to the `created_at` timestamp of the retraction event.
When an `a` tag is used, relays SHOULD delete all versions of the replaceable event up to the `created_at` timestamp of the deletion request event.
## Client Usage
Clients MAY choose to fully hide any events that are referenced by valid retraction events. This includes text notes, direct messages, or other yet-to-be defined event kinds. Alternatively, they MAY show the event along with an icon or other indication that the author has "disowned" the event. The `content` field MAY also be used to replace the retracted events' own content, although a user interface should clearly indicate that this is a retraction reason, not the original content.
Clients MAY choose to fully hide any events that are referenced by valid deletion request events. This includes text notes, direct messages, or other yet-to-be defined event kinds. Alternatively, they MAY show the event along with an icon or other indication that the author has "disowned" the event. The `content` field MAY also be used to replace the deleted events' own content, although a user interface should clearly indicate that this is a deletion request reason, not the original content.
A client MUST validate that each event `pubkey` referenced in the `e` tag of the retraction request is identical to the retraction request `pubkey`, before hiding or deleting any event. Relays can not, in general, perform this validation and should not be treated as authoritative.
A client MUST validate that each event `pubkey` referenced in the `e` tag of the deletion request is identical to the deletion request `pubkey`, before hiding or deleting any event. Relays can not, in general, perform this validation and should not be treated as authoritative.
Clients display the retraction event itself in any way they choose, e.g., not at all, or with a prominent notice.
Clients display the deletion request event itself in any way they choose, e.g., not at all, or with a prominent notice.
Clients MAY choose to inform the user that their request for retraction does not guarantee deletion because it is impossible to delete events from all relays and clients.
Clients MAY choose to inform the user that their request for deletion does not guarantee deletion because it is impossible to delete events from all relays and clients.
## Relay Usage
Relays MAY validate that a retraction event only references events that have the same `pubkey` as the retraction itself, however this is not required since relays may not have knowledge of all referenced events.
Relays MAY validate that a deletion request event only references events that have the same `pubkey` as the deletion request itself, however this is not required since relays may not have knowledge of all referenced events.
## Retracting a Retraction
## Deletion Request of a Deletion Request
Publishing a retraction event against a retraction has no effect. Clients and relays are not obliged to support "unretract" functionality.
Publishing a deletion request event against a deletion request has no effect. Clients and relays are not obliged to support "unrequest deletion" functionality.

2
32.md
View File

@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ Author is labeling their note language as English using ISO-639-1.
Other Notes
-----------
When using this NIP to bulk-label many targets at once, events may be retracted using [NIP-09](09.md) and a replacement
When using this NIP to bulk-label many targets at once, events may be requested for deletion using [NIP-09](09.md) and a replacement
may be published. We have opted not to use parameterizable/replaceable events for this due to the
complexity in coming up with a standard `d` tag. In order to avoid ambiguity when querying,
publishers SHOULD limit labeling events to a single namespace.

2
34.md
View File

@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ An optional source of truth for the state of branches and tags in a repository.
The `refs` tag may appear multiple times, or none.
If no `refs` tags are present, the author is no longer tracking repository state using this event. This approach enables the author to restart tracking state at a later time unlike [NIP-09](09.md) retraction.
If no `refs` tags are present, the author is no longer tracking repository state using this event. This approach enables the author to restart tracking state at a later time unlike [NIP-09](09.md) deletion requests.
The `refs` tag can be optionally extended to enable clients to identify how many commits ahead a ref is:

2
71.md
View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Video Events
`draft` `optional`
This specification defines video events representing a dedicated post of externally hosted content. These video events are _parameterized replaceable_ and retractable per [NIP-09](09.md).
This specification defines video events representing a dedicated post of externally hosted content. These video events are _parameterized replaceable_ and delete requestable per [NIP-09](09.md).
Unlike a `kind 1` event with a video attached, Video Events are meant to contain all additional metadata concerning the subject media and to be surfaced in video-specific clients rather than general micro-blogging clients. The thought is for events of this kind to be referenced in a Netflix, YouTube, or TikTok like nostr client where the video itself is at the center of the experience.

2
72.md
View File

@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ An approval event MUST include one or more community `a` tags, an `e` or `a` tag
The event SHOULD also include the JSON-stringified `post request` event inside the `.content`, and a `k` tag with the original post's event kind to allow filtering of approved posts by kind.
Moderators MAY retract their approval of a post at any time using NIP 09 event retractions.
Moderators MAY request deletion of their approval of a post at any time using [NIP-09 event deletion requests](09.md).
```jsonc
{

2
90.md
View File

@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ Some service providers might choose to submit a `payment-required` as the first
It's not up to this NIP to define how individual vending machines should choose to run their business.
# Cancellation
A job request might be canceled by publishing a `kind:5` retract request event tagging the job request event.
A job request might be canceled by publishing a `kind:5` delete request event tagging the job request event.
# Appendix 1: Job chaining
A Customer MAY request multiple jobs to be processed as a chain, where the output of a job is the input of another job. (e.g. podcast transcription -> summarization of the transcription). This is done by specifying as input an event id of a different job with the `job` type.

4
README.md
View File

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
- [NIP-06: Basic key derivation from mnemonic seed phrase](06.md)
- [NIP-07: `window.nostr` capability for web browsers](07.md)
- [NIP-08: Handling Mentions](08.md) --- **unrecommended**: deprecated in favor of [NIP-27](27.md)
- [NIP-09: Event Retraction](09.md)
- [NIP-09: Event Deletion Request](09.md)
- [NIP-10: Conventions for clients' use of `e` and `p` tags in text events](10.md)
- [NIP-11: Relay Information Document](11.md)
- [NIP-13: Proof of Work](13.md)
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
| `2` | Recommend Relay | 01 (deprecated) |
| `3` | Follows | [02](02.md) |
| `4` | Encrypted Direct Messages | [04](04.md) |
| `5` | Event Retraction | [09](09.md) |
| `5` | Event Deletion Request | [09](09.md) |
| `6` | Repost | [18](18.md) |
| `7` | Reaction | [25](25.md) |
| `8` | Badge Award | [58](58.md) |