mirror of
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git
synced 2024-11-10 14:19:08 -05:00
127 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
127 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
NIP-32
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
Labeling
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
`draft` `optional` `author:staab` `author:gruruya` `author:s3x-jay`
|
|
|
|
A label is a `kind 1985` event that is used to label other entities. This supports a number of use cases, from distributed moderation and content recommendations to reviews and ratings.
|
|
|
|
Label Target
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
The label event MUST include one or more tags representing the object or objects being
|
|
labeled: `e`, `p`, `a`, `r`, or `t` tags. This allows for labeling of events, people, relays,
|
|
or topics respectively. As with NIP-01, a relay hint SHOULD be included when using `e` and
|
|
`p` tags.
|
|
|
|
Label Tag
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
This NIP introduces a new tag `l` which denotes a label, and a new `L` tag which denotes a label namespace.
|
|
A label MUST include a mark matching an `L` tag. `L` tags refer to a tag type within nostr, or a nomenclature
|
|
external to nostr defined either formally or by convention. Any string can be a namespace, but publishers SHOULD
|
|
ensure they are unambiguous by using a well-defined namespace (such as an ISO standard) or reverse domain name notation.
|
|
|
|
Namespaces starting with `#` indicate that the label target should be associated with the label's value.
|
|
This is a way of attaching standard nostr tags to events, pubkeys, relays, urls, etc.
|
|
|
|
Some examples:
|
|
|
|
- `["l", "footstr", "#t"]` - the publisher thinks the given entity should have the `footstr` topic applied.
|
|
- `["l", "<pubkey>", "#p"]` - the publisher thinks the given entity is related to `<pubkey>`
|
|
- `["l", "IT-MI", "ISO-3166-2"]` - Milano, Italy using ISO 3166-2.
|
|
- `["l", "VI-hum", "com.example.ontology"]` - Violence toward a human being as defined by ontology.example.com.
|
|
|
|
`L` tags containing the label namespaces MUST be included in order to support searching by
|
|
namespace rather than by a specific tag. The special `ugc` ("user generated content") namespace
|
|
MAY be used when the label content is provided by an end user.
|
|
|
|
`l` and `L` tags MAY be added to other event kinds to support self-reporting. For events
|
|
with a kind other than 1985, labels refer to the event itself.
|
|
|
|
Label Annotations
|
|
-----
|
|
|
|
A label tag MAY include a 4th positional element detailing extra metadata about the label in question. This string
|
|
should be a json-encoded object. Any key MAY be used, but the following are recommended:
|
|
|
|
- `quality` may have a value of 0 to 1. This allows for an absolute, granular scale that can be represented in any way (5 stars, color scale, etc).
|
|
- `confidence` may have a value of 0 to 1. This indicates the certainty which the author has about their rating.
|
|
- `context` may be an array of urls (including NIP-21 urls) indicating other context that should be considered when interpreting labels.
|
|
|
|
Content
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
Labels should be short, meaningful strings. Longer discussions, such as for a review, or an
|
|
explanation of why something was labeled the way it was, should go in the event's `content` field.
|
|
|
|
Example events
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
A suggestion that multiple pubkeys be associated with the `permies` topic.
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"kind": 1985,
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
["L", "#t"],
|
|
["l", "permies", "#t"],
|
|
["p", <pubkey1>, <relay_url>],
|
|
["p", <pubkey2>, <relay_url>]
|
|
],
|
|
"content": "",
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
A review of a relay.
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"kind": 1985,
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
["L", "com.example.ontology"],
|
|
["l", "relay/review", "com.example.ontology", "{\"quality\": 0.1}"],
|
|
["r", <relay_url>]
|
|
],
|
|
"content": "This relay is full of mean people.",
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Publishers can self-label by adding `l` tags to their own non-1985 events.
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"kind": 1,
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
["L", "com.example.ontology"],
|
|
["l", "IL-frd", "com.example.ontology"]
|
|
],
|
|
"content": "Send me 100 sats and I'll send you 200 back",
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Other Notes
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
When using this NIP to bulk-label many targets at once, events may be deleted and a replacement
|
|
may be published. We have opted not to use parameterizable/replaceable events for this due to the
|
|
complexity in coming up with a standard `d` tag. In order to avoid ambiguity when querying,
|
|
publishers SHOULD limit labeling events to a single namespace.
|
|
|
|
Before creating a vocabulary, explore how your use case may have already been designed and
|
|
imitate that design if possible. Reverse domain name notation is encouraged to avoid
|
|
namespace clashes, but for the sake of interoperability all namespaces should be
|
|
considered open for public use, and not proprietary. In other words, if there is a
|
|
namespace that fits your use case, use it even if it points to someone else's domain name.
|
|
|
|
Vocabularies MAY choose to fully qualify all labels within a namespace (for example,
|
|
`["l", "com.example.vocabulary:my-label"]`. This may be preferred when defining more
|
|
formal vocabularies that should not be confused with another namespace when querying
|
|
without an `L` tag. For these vocabularies, all labels SHOULD include the namespace
|
|
(rather than mixing qualified and unqualified labels).
|