mirror of
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git
synced 2024-11-15 00:09:08 -05:00
147 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
147 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
NIP-69: Nostr Offer STRings
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
Nostr Offer STRings
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
`wip` `optional`
|
|
|
|
This NIP proposes a format for static payment codes in Nostr as a successor to LNURL-Pay, enabling users to initiate Lightning Network payments by scanning or clicking a string.
|
|
|
|
## Motivation
|
|
|
|
Reliance on LNURL has led to centralization via custodial solutions due to the legacy baggage of IP4-NAT/Domain/SSL requirements. Nostr's use-cases are already centered around Lightning, whether as a wallet connector, zap receipts, or its overlapping network effects, rendering Nostr as a de facto "3rd layer" for Lightning and a natural successor to LNURL.
|
|
|
|
When layered over kind 21000, NWC, or other potential Lightning RPCs, this specification enables a seamless user experience similar to legacy LNURL-Pay, without the domain and SSL requirements. Additionally, the signed nature of Nostr communications eliminates the trust requirements inherent in LNURL when a node must outsource the serving of web requests.
|
|
|
|
## Specification
|
|
|
|
### Static Payment Code Format
|
|
|
|
The static payment code is a bech32 (per NIP-19) encoded string prefixed with `noffer`. The encoded string will include the following TLV (Type-Length-Value) items:
|
|
|
|
- `0`: The 32 bytes of the receiving service's public key, encoded in hex.
|
|
- `1`: The relay URL where the receiving service subscribes to payment requests.
|
|
- `2`: The offer string.
|
|
|
|
### Process Flow
|
|
|
|
1. **Payer Scans or Clicks the Static Payment Code**
|
|
2. **Payer's Wallet Decodes the Payment Code**
|
|
3. **Payer's Wallet Sends a Nostr Event to the Specified Relay**
|
|
- Addressed to the receiver's public key, containing the identifier string.
|
|
- Event Type: Ephemeral Kind 21001 | NIP-44 Encrypted
|
|
- Optional: Include additional payer data.
|
|
4. **Receiver Responds with Lightning Invoice**
|
|
- Generates a Lightning invoice and responds with a Nostr event containing the invoice details.
|
|
- Event Type: Ephemeral Kind 21001 | NIP-44 Encrypted
|
|
- Optional: Include additional purchase data.
|
|
5. **Payer Pays the Invoice**
|
|
- Completes the payment by settling the Lightning invoice.
|
|
6. **Optional: Receiver Emits Payment Receipt**
|
|
- This step is out of scope for this NIP, but potential receipt considerations include:
|
|
- Nostr Event as Receipt: Emitting a public Nostr event as a "zap" receipt for verifiable record-keeping.
|
|
- Lightning Pre-Image: Sharing the Lightning pre-image as proof of payment.
|
|
- External / WebHook: The receiver may finalize the flow out-of-band.
|
|
|
|
### Nostr Event
|
|
|
|
This NIP specifies the use of event kind `21001` with the following structure:
|
|
|
|
- `content`: NIP-44 encrypted payment details.
|
|
- `tags`:
|
|
- `p`: Receiver's public key (encoded in hex).
|
|
|
|
Example event:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "<event_id>",
|
|
"pubkey": "<sender_pubkey>",
|
|
"created_at": 1234567890,
|
|
"kind": 21001,
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
["p", "<receiver_pubkey>"],
|
|
["e", "<event_id>"] // used only in response by the receiver to identify the original payment request
|
|
],
|
|
"content": "<NIP-44 encrypted offer and optional payer data>",
|
|
"sig": "<signature>"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The `content` field, after NIP-44 decryption, should contain a stringified JSON object with the following structure:
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
"offer": "<offer_string>",
|
|
"payer_data": "<optional_payer_data>"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Client Behavior
|
|
|
|
### Mandatory
|
|
|
|
Clients implementing this NIP must:
|
|
|
|
1. Decode and validate the structure of the `noffer` bech32-encoded static payment code.
|
|
2. Use NIP-44 encryption for all communication between payer and receiver.
|
|
3. Generate and send kind 21001 events as specified in this NIP.
|
|
4. Parse the `content` field of received events by decrypting and JSON-parsing the stringified content.
|
|
5. Handle potential errors gracefully, providing clear feedback to users.
|
|
6. Respect the relay URL specified in the static payment code for sending payment request events.
|
|
|
|
### Optional
|
|
|
|
Clients implementing this NIP may:
|
|
|
|
1. Support both this protocol and LNURL for backward compatibility during the transition period.
|
|
2. Implement additional features such as multi-recipient payments or integration with other Lightning-related NIPs.
|
|
|
|
### Prohibited
|
|
|
|
Clients implementing this NIP MUST NOT:
|
|
|
|
1. Send unencrypted sensitive information in event content or tags.
|
|
2. Ignore or modify any fields from the encoded static payment code.
|
|
|
|
## Error Handling
|
|
|
|
To ensure consistent error handling across implementations, this NIP defines the following error responses, similar to other NIPs:
|
|
|
|
1. **Invalid Offer**: When the offer ID is invalid or no longer available.
|
|
2. **Temporary Failure**: When the receiver is temporarily unable to process the request.
|
|
3. **Expired Offer**: When the offer has expired and is no longer valid.
|
|
4. **Unsupported Feature**: When the receiver doesn't support a feature requested by the payer.
|
|
|
|
Error responses should be sent as kind 21001 events with the following structure in the encrypted content:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"error": "<error_message>",
|
|
"code": "<error_code>"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Error codes:
|
|
|
|
- 1: Invalid Offer
|
|
- 2: Temporary Failure
|
|
- 3: Expired Offer
|
|
- 4: Unsupported Feature
|
|
|
|
Clients MUST handle these error responses gracefully and display appropriate messages to users.
|
|
|
|
## Transition from LNURL
|
|
|
|
LNURL services wishing to migrate to Nostr Offer STRings should consider adding a `noffer` tag to their responses.
|
|
|
|
## Future Considerations
|
|
|
|
Future versions of this NIP may consider additional features such as:
|
|
|
|
1. Multi-recipient payments.
|
|
2. Integration with other Lightning-related NIPs.
|
|
3. Extended metadata for more complex payment scenarios.
|
|
|
|
## Reference Implementation
|
|
|
|
Lightning.Pub / ShockWallet offers branch |