mirror of
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git
synced 2024-12-22 08:25:53 -05:00
A mirror for NIPS
cf053d2a41
Proposing a couple of changes to the NIP-05 protocol to reduce the chance of fraudulent use of "verified" public keys. At present, I could create an account on a well-known verifying server under a random name, and then send DMs pretending to be someone else, and there's no easy way for users to tell who the verifying account actually belongs to. As well as displaying the name of the account on the verifying server, this PR suggests an enhancement to the JSON data being returned so that clients can redirect the user to the user's profile page on the server. This will make it much easier for users to check that someone who claims to have verified their Nostr account is who they claim to be. |
||
---|---|---|
01.md | ||
02.md | ||
03.md | ||
04.md | ||
05.md | ||
06.md | ||
07.md | ||
08.md | ||
09.md | ||
10.md | ||
11.md | ||
12.md | ||
13.md | ||
14.md | ||
15.md | ||
16.md | ||
19.md | ||
20.md | ||
21.md | ||
22.md | ||
25.md | ||
26.md | ||
28.md | ||
33.md | ||
36.md | ||
40.md | ||
42.md | ||
50.md | ||
README.md |
NIPs
NIPs stand for Nostr Implementation Possibilities. They exist to document what MUST, what SHOULD and what MAY be implemented by Nostr-compatible relay and client software.
- NIP-01: Basic protocol flow description
- NIP-02: Contact List and Petnames
- NIP-03: OpenTimestamps Attestations for Events
- NIP-04: Encrypted Direct Message
- NIP-05: Mapping Nostr keys to DNS-based internet identifiers
- NIP-06: Basic key derivation from mnemonic seed phrase
- NIP-07:
window.nostr
capability for web browsers - NIP-08: Handling Mentions
- NIP-09: Event Deletion
- NIP-10: Conventions for clients' use of
e
andp
tags in text events. - NIP-11: Relay Information Document
- NIP-12: Generic Tag Queries
- NIP-13: Proof of Work
- NIP-14: Subject tag in text events.
- NIP-15: End of Stored Events Notice
- NIP-16: Event Treatment
- NIP-19: bech32-encoded entities
- NIP-20: Command Results
- NIP-21:
nostr:
URL scheme - NIP-22: Event created_at Limits
- NIP-25: Reactions
- NIP-26: Delegated Event Signing
- NIP-28: Public Chat
- NIP-33: Parameterized Replaceable Events
- NIP-36: Sensitive Content
- NIP-40: Expiration Timestamp
- NIP-42: Authentication of clients to relays
- NIP-50: Keywords filter
Event Kinds
kind | description | NIP |
---|---|---|
0 | Metadata | 1, 5 |
1 | Text | 1 |
2 | Recommend Relay | 1 |
3 | Contacts | 2 |
4 | Encrypted Direct Messages | 4 |
5 | Event Deletion | 9 |
7 | Reaction | 25 |
40 | Channel Creation | 28 |
41 | Channel Metadata | 28 |
42 | Channel Message | 28 |
43 | Channel Hide Message | 28 |
44 | Channel Mute User | 28 |
45-49 | Public Chat Reserved | 28 |
22242 | Client Authentication | 42 |
10000-19999 | Replaceable Events Reserved | 16 |
20000-29999 | Ephemeral Events Reserved | 16 |
30000-39999 | Param. Repl. Events Reserved | 33 |
Message types
Client to Relay
type | description | NIP |
---|---|---|
EVENT | used to publish events | 1 |
REQ | used to request events and subscribe to new updates | 1 |
CLOSE | used to stop previous subscriptions | 1 |
AUTH | used to send authentication events | 42 |
Relay to Client
type | description | NIP |
---|---|---|
EVENT | used to send events requested to clients | 1 |
NOTICE | used to send human-readable messages to clients | 1 |
EOSE | used to notify clients all stored events have been sent | 15 |
OK | used to notify clients if an EVENT was successuful | 20 |
AUTH | used to send authentication challenges | 42 |
Please update these lists when proposing NIPs introducing new event kinds.
When experimenting with kinds, keep in mind the classification introduced by NIP-16.
Standardized Tags
name | value | other parameters | NIP |
---|---|---|---|
e | event id (hex) | relay URL, marker | 1, 10 |
p | pubkey (hex) | relay URL | 1 |
r | a reference (URL, etc) | 12 | |
t | hashtag | 12 | |
g | geohash | 12 | |
nonce | random | 13 | |
subject | subject | 14 | |
d | identifier | 33 | |
expiration | unix timestamp (string) | 40 |
Criteria for acceptance of NIPs
- They should be implemented in at least two clients and one relay -- when applicable.
- They should make sense.
- They should be optional and backwards-compatible: care must be taken such that clients and relays that choose to not implement them do not stop working when interacting with the ones that choose to.
- There should be no more than one way of doing the same thing.
- Other rules will be made up when necessary.
License
All NIPs are public domain.