nips/47.md
2023-05-23 11:41:45 -05:00

12 KiB

NIP-47

Nostr Wallet Connect

draft optional author:kiwiidb author:bumi author:semisol author:vitorpamplona

Rationale

This NIP describes a way for clients to access a remote Lightning wallet through a standardized protocol. Custodians may implement this, or the user may run a bridge that bridges their wallet/node and the Nostr Wallet Connect protocol.

Terms

  • client: Nostr app on any platform that wants to pay Lightning invoices.
  • user: The person using the client, and want's to connect their wallet app to their client.
  • wallet service: Nostr app that typically runs on an always-on computer (eg. in the cloud or on a Raspberry Pi). It interacts with the client as a NIP-01 relay. This app has access to the APIs of the wallets it serves.

Events

There are three event kinds:

  • NIP-47 info event: 13194
  • NIP-47 request: 23194
  • NIP-47 response: 23195

Theory of Operation

  1. Users who which to use this NIP to send lightning payments to other nostr users must first acquire a special "connection" URI from their NIP-47 compliant wallet application. The wallet application may provide this URI using a QR screen, or a pasteable string, or some other means. The format of this URI, as observed from the alby wallet, is:
  • nostrwalletconnect://<connection-id>?relay=<relay-url>&secret=<secret>&lud16=<lud16> See: Nostr Wallet Connect URI below.
  • The important data in this URI are the <connection-id>, <relay>, and <secret>. The <lud16> is optional and may be used by the client to update the lud16 field of the user's profile.
  • The <secret> is a nostr private key. The corresponding public key (secret-pubkey) should be caclulated by the client for use later.
    • Note: It's not clear to me (UB) why this information was packed into a URI rather than a json string. That seems a bit strange. Perhaps it is because the string is meant to be communicated over a QR code; and perhaps there are character limitations with QR. I don't know.
  1. The user should copy this URI into their client(s) by pasting, or scanning the QR, etc. The client(s) should use the information within it whenever the user makes a payment. The client should subscribe to an info (13194) event from the relay(s) specified in the URI. The wallet service will have sent that event to those relays earlier, and the relays will hold it as a replaceable event.
  • The suscription should be of the form: ["REQ","<subscription>",{"kinds":[13194],"authors":["<connection-id>"]}]
  • My observation has been that the relay will provide a single event followed by an EOSE.
  • The content of the event should contain the string pay_invoice, signifying that this connection can be used for making payments.
  1. When the user initiates a payment their nostr client uses the lud16 or lud06 fields of the recipient's profile to create an invoice, as in NIP 57. The client then creates a pay_invoice request, encrypts the content, and sends it (kind 23194) to the relay(s) specified in the connection URI. The wallet service will be listening on those relays and will decrypt the request and then contact the user's wallet application to send the payment. The wallet service will know how to talk to the wallet application because the connection URI specified relay(s) that have access to the wallet app API.
  • Before sending the request, the client should subscribe to recieve the kind:23195 response authored by <connection-id>.
    • ["REQ","<subscription>",{"kinds":[23195],"authors":["<connection-id>"]}]
  • The pubkey field of the request should be the secret-pubkey.
  • The request should be signed by the <secret> private key.
  • The NIP-04 encryption of the content should use the <secret> private key and the <connection-id> from the URI.
  1. Once the payment is complete the wallet service will send an encrypted response (kind 23195) to the user over the relay(s) in the URI.
  • Many 23195 events may be recieved. The client should wait for the one with a p tag equal to the secret-pubkey.
    • The pubkey field of this event will be the <connection-id>.
    • The content of this event should be decoded using the <secret> private key and the <connection-id>.

Event Descriptions

The info event (13194) should be a replaceable event that is published by the wallet service on the relay to indicate which commands it supports. The content should be a plaintext string with the supported commands, space-seperated, eg. pay_invoice get_balance. Only the pay_invoice command is described in this NIP, but other commands might be defined in different NIPs.

  • The request (23194) event SHOULD contain one p tag, containing the <connection-id> from the URI.
  • The response (23195) event SHOULD contain one p tag containing the secret-pubkey derived from the <secret> private key.
  • The response event MAY contain an e tag with the id of the request event it is responding to.
    • Note: The alby response does not contain this e key. See below.

The content of requests and responses is a JSON-RPCish object with a semi-fixed structure shown below. It is encrypted with NIP04, using the <secret> private key and the <connection-id> from the URI.

Request:

{
    "method": "pay_invoice", // method, string
    "params": { // params, object
        "invoice": "lnbc50n1..." // command-related data
    }
}

Response:

{
    "result_type": "pay_invoice", //indicates the structure of the result field
    "error": { //object, non-null in case of error
        "code": "UNAUTHORIZED", //string error code, see below
        "message": "human readable error message"
    },
    "result": { // result, object. null in case of error.
        "preimage": "0123456789abcdef..." // command-related data
    }
}
  • The result_type field MUST contain the name of the method that this event is responding to.
  • If the request was successful there should be no error field.
  • If the request was not successful the error field MUST contain a message field with a human readable error message and a code field with the error code.

Error codes

  • RATE_LIMITED: The client is sending commands too fast. It should retry in a few seconds.
  • NOT_IMPLEMENTED: The command is not known or is intentionally not implemented.
  • INSUFFICIENT_BALANCE: The wallet does not have enough funds to cover a fee reserve or the payment amount.
  • QUOTA_EXCEEDED: The wallet has exceeded its spending quota.
  • RESTRICTED: This public key is not allowed to do this operation.
  • UNAUTHORIZED: This public key has no wallet connected.
  • INTERNAL: An internal error.
  • OTHER: Other error.

Nostr Wallet Connect URI

client discovers wallet service by scanning a QR code, handling a deeplink or pasting in a URI.

The wallet service generates this connection URI with protocol nostr+walletconnect: and base path it's hex-encoded <connection-id> with the following query string parameters:

  • relay Required. (Example: wss://relay.getalby.com/v1) URL of the relay where the wallet service is connected and will be listening for events. May be more than one.

Note: It's not clear why there might be more than one relay, nor what procedure clients might use to take advantage of that.

  • secret Required. 32-byte randomly generated hex encoded string. The client MUST use this to sign events and encrypt payloads when communicating with the wallet service.
    • Authorization does not require passing keys back and forth.
    • The user can have different keys for different applications. Keys can be revoked and created at will and have arbitrary constraints (eg. budgets).
    • The key is harder to leak since it is not shown to the user and backed up.
    • It improves privacy because the user's main key would not be linked to their payments.
  • lud16 Recommended. (Example: unclebob@getalby.com) A lightning address that clients can use to automatically setup the lud16 field on the user's profile if they have none configured.

The client should use this connection when the user wants to perform actions like paying an invoice. Due to this NIP using ephemeral events, it is recommended to pick relays that do not close connections on inactivity to not drop events.

Example connection string

nostr+walletconnect:b889ff5b1513b641e2a139f661a661364979c5beee91842f8f0ef42ab558e9d4?relay=wss%3A%2F%2Frelay.damus.io&secret=71a8c14c1407c113601079c4302dab36460f0ccd0ad506f1f2dc73b5100e4f3c

Commands

pay_invoice

Description: Requests payment of an invoice.

Request:

{
    "method": "pay_invoice",
    "params": {
        "invoice": "lnbc50n1..." // bolt11 invoice
    }
}

Response:

{
    "result_type": "pay_invoice",
    "result": { 
        "preimage": "0123456789abcdef..." // preimage of the payment
    }
}

Errors:

  • PAYMENT_FAILED: The payment failed. This may be due to a timeout, exhausting all routes, insufficient capacity or similar.

Example pay invoice flow

  1. The user scans the QR code generated by the wallet service with their client application, they follow a nostr+walletconnect: deeplink or configure the connection details manually.
  2. The client sends a subscription request to the wallet service relay for the (13194) info event.
  3. The wallet service relay responds with the info event and an EOSE.
  4. client sends an event to the wallet service service with kind 23194. The content is a pay_invoice request. The private key is the secret from the connection string above. The pubkey is the secret-pubkey derived from the secret. The content is encrypted using the secret and the <connection-id>.
  • Before sending the request, the client should subscribe to recieve the 23195 response from the wallet service relay.
  1. wallet service verifies that the author's key is authorized to perform the payment, decrypts the payload and sends the payment.
  2. wallet service responds to the event by sending an event with kind 23195 and p tag with secret-pubkey.
  • The encrypted content will be a response containing either an error message or a preimage.
    • ignore the preimage if you like.

Using a dedicated relay

This NIP does not specify any requirements on the type of relays used. However, if the user is using a custodial service it might make sense to use a relay that is hosted by the custodial service. The relay may then enforce authentication to prevent metadata leaks. Not depending on a 3rd party relay would also improve reliability in this case.

Observations from the field.

The following is an example of the flow of messages between the more-speech client and the getalby.com wallet connect relay.

more-speech-><-alby
["REQ","<subscription>",{"kinds":[13194],"authors":["<connection-id>"]}]
["EVENT" "<subscription>" {"kind":,13194,"content":,"pay_invoice"}]
["EOSE" "<subscription>"}]
["REQ","<subscription>",{"kinds":[23195],"authors":["<connection-id>"]}]
["EVENT",{"kind":23194,"pubkey":,"<secret-pubkey>","content":,<encrypted request>}]
...["EVENT" "<subscription>" {"kind":,23195,"tags":"p",<???>,"content":,<???>}]
["EVENT" "<subscription>" {"kind":,23195,"tags":"p",<secret-pubkey>,"content":,<encrypted response>}]
...["EVENT" "<subscription>" {"kind":,23195,"tags":"p",<???>,"content":,<???>}]
["EOSE" "<subscription>"}]