mirror of
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git
synced 2024-11-09 22:09:06 -05:00
277 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
277 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
# NIP-44
|
|
|
|
## Encrypted Payloads (Versioned)
|
|
|
|
`optional`
|
|
|
|
The NIP introduces a new data format for keypair-based encryption. This NIP is versioned
|
|
to allow multiple algorithm choices to exist simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
Nostr is a key directory. Every nostr user has their own public key, which solves key
|
|
distribution problems present in other solutions. The goal of this NIP is to have a
|
|
simple way to send messages between nostr accounts that cannot be read by everyone.
|
|
|
|
The scheme has a number of important shortcomings:
|
|
|
|
- No deniability: it is possible to prove the event was signed by a particular key
|
|
- No forward secrecy: when a user key is compromised, it is possible to decrypt all previous conversations
|
|
- No post-compromise security: when a user key is compromised, it is possible to decrypt all future conversations
|
|
- No post-quantum security: a powerful quantum computer would be able to decrypt the messages
|
|
- IP address leak: user IP may be seen by relays and all intermediaries between user and relay
|
|
- Date leak: the message date is public, since it is a part of NIP 01 event
|
|
- Limited message size leak: padding only partially obscures true message length
|
|
- No attachments: they are not supported
|
|
|
|
Lack of forward secrecy is partially mitigated by these two factors:
|
|
1. the messages should only be stored on relays, specified by the user, instead of a set of all public relays.
|
|
2. the relays are supposed to regularly delete older messages.
|
|
|
|
For risky situations, users should chat in specialized E2EE messaging software and limit use of nostr to exchanging contacts.
|
|
|
|
## Dependence on NIP-01
|
|
|
|
It's not enough to use NIP-44 for encryption: the output must also be signed.
|
|
|
|
In nostr case, the payload is serialized and signed as per NIP-01 rules.
|
|
|
|
The same event can be serialized in two different ways, resulting in two distinct signatures. So, it's important to ensure serialization rules, which are defined in NIP-01, are the same across different NIP-44 implementations.
|
|
|
|
After serialization, the event is signed by Schnorr signature over secp256k1, defined in BIP340. It's important to ensure the key and signature validity as per BIP340 rules.
|
|
|
|
## Versions
|
|
|
|
Currently defined encryption algorithms:
|
|
|
|
- `0x00` - Reserved
|
|
- `0x01` - Deprecated and undefined
|
|
- `0x02` - secp256k1 ECDH, HKDF, padding, ChaCha20, HMAC-SHA256, base64
|
|
|
|
## Version 2
|
|
|
|
The algorithm choices are justified in a following way:
|
|
|
|
- Encrypt-then-mac-then-sign instead of encrypt-then-sign-then-mac: only events wrapped in NIP-01 signed envelope are currently accepted by nostr.
|
|
- ChaCha instead of AES: it's faster and has [better security against multi-key attacks](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits/)
|
|
- ChaCha instead of XChaCha: XChaCha has not been standardized. Also, we don't need xchacha's improved collision resistance of nonces: every message has a new (key, nonce) pair.
|
|
- HMAC-SHA256 instead of Poly1305: polynomial MACs are much easier to forge SHA256 instead of SHA3 or BLAKE: it is already used in nostr. Also blake's
|
|
speed advantage is smaller in non-parallel environments - Custom padding instead of padmé: better leakage reduction for small messages
|
|
- Base64 encoding instead of an other compression algorithm: it is widely available, and is already used in nostr
|
|
|
|
### Functions and operations
|
|
|
|
- Cryptographic methods
|
|
- `secure_random_bytes(length)` fetches randomness from CSPRNG
|
|
- `hkdf(IKM, salt, info, L)` represents HKDF [(RFC 5869)](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5869) with SHA256 hash function,
|
|
comprised of methods `hkdf_extract(IKM, salt)` and `hkdf_expand(OKM, info, L)`
|
|
- `chacha20(key, nonce, data)` is ChaCha20 [(RFC 8439)](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8439), with starting counter set to 0
|
|
- `hmac_sha256(key, message)` is HMAC [(RFC 2104)](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2104)
|
|
- `secp256k1_ecdh(priv_a, pub_b)` is multiplication of point B by scalar a (`a ⋅ B`), defined in [BIP340](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/e918b50731397872ad2922a1b08a5a4cd1d6d546/bip-0340.mediawiki). The operation produces shared point, and we encode the shared point's 32-byte x coordinate, using method `bytes(P)` from BIP340. Private and public keys must be validated as per BIP340: pubkey must be a valid, on-curve point, and private key must be a scalar in range `[1, secp256k1_order - 1]`
|
|
- Operators
|
|
- `x[i:j]`, where `x` is a byte array and `i, j <= 0`,
|
|
returns a `(j - i)`-byte array with a copy of the `i`-th byte (inclusive) to the `j`-th byte (exclusive) of `x`
|
|
- Constants `c`:
|
|
- `min_plaintext_size` is 1. 1b msg is padded to 32b.
|
|
- `max_plaintext_size` is 65535 (64kb - 1). It is padded to 65536.
|
|
- Functions
|
|
- `base64_encode(string)` and `base64_decode(bytes)` are Base64 ([RFC 4648](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4648), with padding)
|
|
- `concat` refers to byte array concatenation
|
|
- `is_equal_ct(a, b)` is constant-time equality check of 2 byte arrays
|
|
- `utf8_encode(string)` and `utf8_decode(bytes)` transform string to byte array and back
|
|
- `write_u8(number)` restricts number to values 0..255 and encodes into Big-Endian uint8 byte array
|
|
- `write_u16_be(number)` restricts number to values 0..65535 and encodes into Big-Endian uint16 byte array
|
|
- `zeros(length)` creates byte array of length `length >= 0`, filled with zeros
|
|
- `floor(number)` and `log2(number)` are well-known mathematical methods
|
|
|
|
User-defined functions:
|
|
|
|
```py
|
|
# Calculates length of the padded byte array.
|
|
def calc_padded_len(unpadded_len):
|
|
next_power = 1 << (floor(log2(unpadded_len - 1))) + 1
|
|
if next_power <= 256:
|
|
chunk = 32
|
|
else:
|
|
chunk = next_power / 8
|
|
if unpadded_len <= 32:
|
|
return 32
|
|
else:
|
|
return chunk * (floor((len - 1) / chunk) + 1)
|
|
|
|
# Converts unpadded plaintext to padded bytearray
|
|
def pad(plaintext):
|
|
unpadded = utf8_encode(plaintext)
|
|
unpadded_len = len(plaintext)
|
|
if (unpadded_len < c.min_plaintext_size or
|
|
unpadded_len > c.max_plaintext_size): raise Exception('invalid plaintext length')
|
|
prefix = write_u16_be(unpadded_len)
|
|
suffix = zeros(calc_padded_len(unpadded_len) - unpadded_len)
|
|
return concat(prefix, unpadded, suffix)
|
|
|
|
# Converts padded bytearray to unpadded plaintext
|
|
def unpad(padded):
|
|
unpadded_len = read_uint16_be(padded[0:2])
|
|
unpadded = padded[2:2+unpadded_len]
|
|
if (unpadded_len == 0 or
|
|
len(unpadded) != unpadded_len or
|
|
len(padded) != 2 + calc_padded_len(unpadded_len)): raise Exception('invalid padding')
|
|
return utf8_decode(unpadded)
|
|
|
|
# metadata: always 65b (version: 1b, nonce: 32b, max: 32b)
|
|
# plaintext: 1b to 0xffff
|
|
# padded plaintext: 32b to 0xffff
|
|
# ciphertext: 32b+2 to 0xffff+2
|
|
# raw payload: 99 (65+32+2) to 65603 (65+0xffff+2)
|
|
# compressed payload (base64): 132b to 87472b
|
|
def decode_payload(payload):
|
|
plen = len(payload)
|
|
if plen == 0 or payload[0] == '#': raise Exception('unknown version')
|
|
if plen < 132 or plen > 87472: raise Exception('invalid payload size')
|
|
data = base64_decode(payload)
|
|
dlen = len(d)
|
|
if dlen < 99 or dlen > 65603: raise Exception('invalid data size');
|
|
vers = data[0]
|
|
if vers != 2: raise Exception('unknown version ' + vers)
|
|
nonce = data[1:33]
|
|
ciphertext = data[33:dlen - 32]
|
|
mac = data[dlen - 32:dlen]
|
|
return (nonce, ciphertext, mac)
|
|
|
|
def hmac_aad(key, message, aad):
|
|
if len(aad) != 32: raise Exception('AAD associated data must be 32 bytes');
|
|
return hmac(sha256, key, concat(aad, message));
|
|
|
|
# Calculates long-term key between users A and B: `get_key(Apriv, Bpub) == get_key(Bpriv, Apub)`
|
|
def get_conversation_key(private_key_a, public_key_b):
|
|
shared_x = secp256k1_ecdh(private_key_a, public_key_b)
|
|
return hkdf_extract(IKM=shared_x, salt=utf8_encode('nip44-v2'))
|
|
|
|
# Calculates unique per-message key
|
|
def get_message_keys(conversation_key, nonce):
|
|
if len(conversation_key) != 32: raise Exception('invalid conversation_key length')
|
|
if len(nonce) != 32: raise Exception('invalid nonce length')
|
|
keys = hkdf_expand(OKM=conversation_key, info=nonce, L=76)
|
|
chacha_key = keys[0:32]
|
|
chacha_nonce = keys[32:44]
|
|
hmac_key = keys[44:76]
|
|
return (chacha_key, chacha_nonce, hmac_key)
|
|
|
|
def encrypt(plaintext, conversation_key, nonce):
|
|
(chacha_key, chacha_nonce, hmac_key) = get_message_keys(conversation_key, nonce)
|
|
padded = pad(plaintext)
|
|
ciphertext = chacha20(key=chacha_key, nonce=chacha_nonce, data=padded)
|
|
mac = hmac_aad(key=hmac_key, message=ciphertext, aad=nonce)
|
|
return base64_encode(concat(write_u8(2), nonce, ciphertext, mac))
|
|
|
|
def decrypt(payload, conversation_key):
|
|
(nonce, ciphertext, mac) = decode_payload(payload)
|
|
(chacha_key, chacha_nonce, hmac_key) = get_message_keys(conversation_key, nonce)
|
|
calculated_mac = hmac_aad(key=hmac_key, message=ciphertext, aad=nonce)
|
|
if not is_equal_ct(calculated_mac, mac): raise Exception('invalid MAC')
|
|
padded_plaintext = chacha20(key=chacha_key, nonce=chacha_nonce, data=ciphertext)
|
|
return unpad(padded_plaintext)
|
|
|
|
# Usage:
|
|
# conversation_key = get_conversation_key(sender_privkey, recipient_pubkey)
|
|
# nonce = secure_random_bytes(32)
|
|
# payload = encrypt('hello world', conversation_key, nonce)
|
|
# 'hello world' == decrypt(payload, conversation_key)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Encryption
|
|
|
|
1. Calculate conversation key
|
|
- Execute ECDH (scalar multiplication) of public key B by private key A.
|
|
Output `shared_x` must be unhashed, 32-byte encoded x coordinate of the shared point.
|
|
- Use HKDF-extract with sha256, `IKM=shared_x` and `salt=utf8_encode('nip44-v2')`
|
|
- HKDF output will be `conversation_key` between two users
|
|
- It is always the same, when key roles are swapped: `conv(a, B) == conv(b, A)`
|
|
2. Generate random 32-byte nonce
|
|
- Always use [CSPRNG](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographically_secure_pseudorandom_number_generator)
|
|
- Don't generate nonce from message content
|
|
- Don't re-use the same nonce between messages: doing so would make them decryptable,
|
|
but won't leak long-term key
|
|
3. Calculate message keys
|
|
- The keys are generated from `conversation_key` and `nonce`. Validate that both are 32 bytes
|
|
- Use HKDF-expand, with sha256, `OKM=conversation_key`, `info=nonce` and `L=76`
|
|
- Slice 76-byte HKDF output into: `chacha_key` (bytes 0..32), `chacha_nonce` (bytes 32..44), `hmac_key` (bytes 44..76)
|
|
4. Add padding
|
|
- Content must be encoded from UTF-8 into byte array
|
|
- Validate plaintext length. Minimum is 1 byte, maximum is 65535 bytes
|
|
- Padding format is: `[plaintext_length: u16][plaintext][zero_bytes]`
|
|
- Padding algorithm is related to powers-of-two, with min padded msg size of 32
|
|
- Plaintext length is encoded in big-endian as first 2 bytes of the padded blob
|
|
5. Encrypt padded content
|
|
- Use ChaCha20, with key and nonce from step 3
|
|
6. Calculate MAC (message authentication code) with AAD
|
|
- AAD is used: instead of calculating MAC on ciphertext,
|
|
it's calculated over a concatenation of `nonce` and `ciphertext`
|
|
- Validate that AAD (nonce) is 32 bytes
|
|
7. Base64-encode (with padding) params: `concat(version, nonce, ciphertext, mac)`
|
|
|
|
After encryption, it's necessary to sign it. Use NIP-01 to serialize the event, with result base64 assigned to event's `content`. Then, use NIP-01 to sign the event using schnorr signature scheme over secp256k1.
|
|
|
|
#### Decryption
|
|
|
|
Before decryption, it's necessary to validate the message's pubkey and signature. The public key must be a valid non-zero secp256k1 curve point, and signature must be valid secp256k1 schnorr signature. For exact validation rules, refer to BIP-340.
|
|
|
|
1. Check if first payload's character is `#`
|
|
- `#` is an optional future-proof flag that means non-base64 encoding is used
|
|
- The `#` is not present in base64 alphabet, but, instead of throwing `base64 is invalid`,
|
|
an app must say the encryption version is not yet supported
|
|
2. Decode base64
|
|
- Base64 is decoded into `version, nonce, ciphertext, mac`
|
|
- If the version is unknown, the app, an app must say the encryption version is not yet supported
|
|
- Validate length of base64 message to prevent DoS on base64 decoder: it can be in range from 132 to 87472 chars
|
|
- Validate length of decoded message to verify output of the decoder: it can be in range from 99 to 65603 bytes
|
|
3. Calculate conversation key
|
|
- See step 1 of Encryption
|
|
4. Calculate message keys
|
|
- See step 3 of Encryption
|
|
5. Calculate MAC (message authentication code) with AAD and compare
|
|
- Stop and throw an error if MAC doesn't match the decoded one from step 2
|
|
- Use constant-time comparison algorithm
|
|
6. Decrypt ciphertext
|
|
- Use ChaCha20 with key and nonce from step 3
|
|
7. Remove padding
|
|
- Read the first two BE bytes of plaintext that correspond to plaintext length
|
|
- Verify that the length of sliced plaintext matches the value of the two BE bytes
|
|
- Verify that calculated padding from encryption's step 3 matches the actual padding
|
|
|
|
## Audit
|
|
|
|
The v2 of the standard has been subject to an audit by [Cure53](https://cure53.de) in December 2023.
|
|
Check out [audit-2023.12.pdf](https://github.com/paulmillr/nip44/blob/ce63c2eaf345e9f7f93b48f829e6bdeb7e7d7964/audit-2023.12.pdf)
|
|
and [auditor's website](https://cure53.de/audit-report_nip44-implementations.pdf).
|
|
|
|
## Tests and code
|
|
|
|
A collection of implementations in different languages is available at https://github.com/paulmillr/nip44.
|
|
|
|
We publish extensive test vectors. Instead of having it in the document directly, a sha256 checksum of vectors is provided:
|
|
|
|
269ed0f69e4c192512cc779e78c555090cebc7c785b609e338a62afc3ce25040 nip44.vectors.json
|
|
|
|
Example of test vector from the file:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"sec1": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001",
|
|
"sec2": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002",
|
|
"conversation_key": "c41c775356fd92eadc63ff5a0dc1da211b268cbea22316767095b2871ea1412d",
|
|
"nonce": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001",
|
|
"plaintext": "a",
|
|
"payload": "AgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABee0G5VSK0/9YypIObAtDKfYEAjD35uVkHyB0F4DwrcNaCXlCWZKaArsGrY6M9wnuTMxWfp1RTN9Xga8no+kF5Vsb"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The file also contains intermediate values. A quick guidance with regards to its usage:
|
|
|
|
- `valid.get_conversation_key`: calculate conversation_key from secret key sec1 and public key pub2
|
|
- `valid.get_message_keys`: calculate chacha_key, chacha_nocne, hmac_key from conversation_key and nonce
|
|
- `valid.calc_padded_len`: take unpadded length (first value), calculate padded length (second value)
|
|
- `valid.encrypt_decrypt`: emulate real conversation. Calculate pub2 from sec2, verify conversation_key from (sec1, pub2), encrypt, verify payload, then calculate pub1 from sec1, verify conversation_key from (sec2, pub1), decrypt, verify plaintext.
|
|
- `valid.encrypt_decrypt_long_msg`: same as previous step, but instead of a full plaintext and payload, their checksum is provided.
|
|
- `invalid.encrypt_msg_lengths`
|
|
- `invalid.get_conversation_key`: calculating converastion_key must throw an error
|
|
- `invalid.decrypt`: decrypting message content must throw an error
|